Cryptocurrency Exchanges Serious about 1099 Reporting Despite Incomplete IRS Guidance

October 21, 2019
Wendy Walker

Ron Quaranta is founder and chairman of Wall Street Blockchain Alliance, the world’s leading non-profit trade association promoting the comprehensive adoption of blockchain technology and crypto assets across global financial markets. He will speak at the GCS Intelligent Reporting conference in San Antonio later this month. Ron spoke with Sovos recently about cryptocurrency tax regulations in light of recently released IRS clarification of crypto tax policy

Sovos: What was your initial impression of guidance the IRS released on crypto taxation?

Ron Quaranta: Keeping in mind that I am not an accountant by training, my perspective is that the IRS may still be struggling with some of the complicated aspects of blockchain and cryptoassets. For example, it seems to me that the agency is conflating airdrops and hard forks. I think they don’t fully understand the delineation between a hard fork and an airdrop. The way they represented it seems to be a sequential process in their minds. The knowledgeable technology and accounting folks realize that’s not necessarily correct, and that there are other iterations that need to be considered. For instance, are all taxpayers expected to be aware of the moment they actually “receive” an airdropped token, and what is the tax burden at that point? There are still many questions to be answered.

A hard fork is a new fork away from the blockchain. Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold were forks away from the blockchain. This is acceded to by the majority of users within a blockchain. The fork becomes the new blockchain going forward. An airdrop is the giving away of free tokens, as a very basic example. You don’t necessarily need one to accomplish the other.

Sovos: What do you think the impact of the IRS guidance will be for individuals and institutions?

Ron Quaranta: If the burden is on individual taxpayers to recognize those two events, they might not be able to do it. Mom and Pop who open an account with an exchange the way we open a bank account will have very little understanding of this. It points to the need for tools that exchanges and vendors can and are beginning to develop to help investors to understand and act on their tax responsibilities.

From an institutional perspective, my personal opinion is that a lot of people were hoping was that the IRS would back off of calling crypto assets property as it did with the initial guidance in 2014. Many hedge fund colleagues have noted that from their vantage point, this did not make much sense. A lot of people were hoping for guidance that moved away from that. Everyone had hoped and wished that IRS would come down with a different viewpoint, and that’s not what it did.

Sovos: The guidance largely avoided any mention of 1099 reporting or tax reporting of any kind. What does that mean for exchanges that might not know how to handle reporting due to a lack of specific guidance?

Ron Quaranta: As these exchanges professionalize, as they begin to seep more deeply into the US ecosystem, they’ll have to amend some of these tools for 1099 reporting. My understanding is that they’re going down that road already. When we talk about these larger exchanges, they have chief compliance officers and accounting professionals, and regular interaction with the US Department of Treasury, the IRS, the SEC and other regulators. They are not unprepared to address reporting challenges.

I don’t fall into the camp that says they don’t know what they’re doing. There are reasons they’re registered money service businesses and trust companies. All of our members are institutional in one shape or form. They have the tools and resources to do that archaeology and research.

Sovos: How about individual investors? The IRS has been sending a message that it will crack down on investors who don’t report crypto transactions. Are they getting the message? Would clarification of reporting regulations help?

Ron Quaranta: Individuals who are investing at exchanges are a different story. People expect reporting on their retirement accounts, for instance, but they may not necessarily be getting that with crypto. It’s an uneven evolution depending on the type of venue or exchange. If you’re talking about the five largest exchanges, they’ve got as much reporting that they can put together in light of the guidance that does exist. That has to evolve based on new guidance.

How that evolves over time will be a reflection of how much is reported to the IRS as virtual currency transactions. Of the several million investors in 2018, according to some estimates something like less than a few thousand reported crypto transactions. That’s either out of malfeasance or ignorance, but the proof will be in the pudding. The top line of new Form 1040, while confusing and in need of clarification, cites virtual currency, so the IRS is certainly paying more attention to crypto tax enforcement. 

Sovos: With no regulation by a central bank, crypto used to have a reputation for being a bit lawless and a haven for avoiding taxes. How well do those ideas hold up today?

Ron Quaranta: Our trade association is focused on global corporates and institutional investors. I honestly don’t get the sense it’s a crypto-anarchist conversation anymore. We don’t have a member who says we don’t believe crypto should be taxed. What they want to know is how they can become compliant so they can be more deeply involved. No institution wants to pick a fight with the IRS, Treasury or the SEC. The notion that crypto assets exist solely to help people avoid taxes seems to me to be patently false. That does not mean we’ll be in a utopia of people always paying their taxes, but it’s misleading to say that crypto assets exist just for tax avoidance.

We live in a global ecosystem that says crypto is not about avoiding taxes. Crypto has a lot of appeal for other reasons. There will be some funds interested in trading into the volatility in the market. Corporates understand that some levels of commerce will happen with crypto assets. They will need to understand how to value, report and pay taxes on those. They will be looking for tools and processes to do that. In many instances, some individuals may be caught up in the get-rich-quick hype by purchasing crypto like Bitcoin. But that perspective also is evolving as individuals learn more about crypto and virtual assets.

Sovos: We don’t know where the IRS will go from here on guidance, what the agency will issue next or when it might provide another clarification. Where do you see crypto regulations and enforcement heading from here?

Ron Quaranta: I won’t say that we’re done. This space is evolving so rapidly that we don’t know what we don’t know. One of the things that comes out of our legal conversations is that many of these guidelines are based on facts and circumstances. There’s value in what the IRS came up with. But it will need to keep evolving.

My personal opinion on that is no one wants to run a business that sits in fear of enforcement every year. They want to be compliant and they want to offer the opportunity for US citizens to trade an instruments like virtual assets that many believe are a new asset class. The important aspect is the education curve. I think institutions are beginning to understand the importance of having crypto assets in portfolios. Three or four years ago, they said they didn’t want to hear about bitcoin. They had this false belief that it was illegal. That’s not the case anymore. There’s an opportunity for alpha. These are new asset classes they need to understand.

Take Action

Educate yourself. Empower your business. Engage with your community. Register now for GCS Intelligent Reporting Summit San Antonio! 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Wendy Walker

Wendy Walker is the principal of Tax Information Reporting solutions at Sovos. She has more than 15 years of tax operations management and tax compliance experience with emphasis in large financial institutions, having held positions with CTI Technologies (a division of IHS Markit), Zions Bancorporation and JP Morgan Chase. Wendy has served as a member of several prominent industry advisory boards. She graduated with a BS in Process Engineering from Franklin University and earned her MBA from Ohio Dominican University, in Columbus, Ohio.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

ShipCompliant United States
June 4, 2020
Granholm: 15 Years of Shipping Wine…and More

How much can change in fifteen years?  It was May 2005 when the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in Granholm v. Heald, one of the most consequential beverage alcohol-related cases the Court has heard. The case challenged laws in Michigan and New York that permitted in-state wineries to make direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipments to their […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 4, 2020
European Court Rules Against UK on VAT Treatment of Futures Trading

In the midst of ongoing negotiations following the UK’s exit from the European Union (EU), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that the UK has impermissibly expanded the scope of its 0% VAT rate on futures trading.  And, that this has been occurring over a period spanning more than forty […]

ShipCompliant United States
June 3, 2020
4 Steps to Get Started Shipping DtC

Direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping of beverage alcohol products is a $3 billion dollar market that continues to grow annually. DtC shipping can be a great way to grow your business by reaching new audiences, expanding your customer base, and increasing your sales. But, before you can take advantage of this growing market, there are some steps […]

E-Invoicing Compliance LATAM Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 3, 2020
Latin America: An Update on E-Invoice Requirements

In the field of global e-invoicing and tax control, most eyes have been focused on trailblazing initiatives in Asia, as countries such as India, Vietnam and Thailand look set to introduce new reforms in this area. However, even in the home of mandatory digital tax controls – Latin America – where mandatory clearance of B2B […]

EMEA IPT Italy Tax Compliance
June 3, 2020
Italian Parafiscal Complexities

Premium tax and parafiscal compliance for insurers authorised to operate under the Italian regime can be challenging. For the experienced, it may seem that each year brings a different obligation to be met with new requirements often being introduced. There are almost always links between an upcoming year’s reporting requirements and declarations made in previous […]