Whose Responsibility Is It to Report Unclaimed Property?

October 24, 2019
Karen Jackson

Unclaimed property results from the everyday functions of a company’s operations. As state budget deficits continue to grow, companies should expect unclaimed property compliance and related audits to continue and possibly increase. So, who is responsible for handling the process of Unclaimed Property management and escheatment to the state and keeping their company compliant?

Tax professionals may not want to think that the responsibility for unclaimed property compliance belongs to them, but that may not be the case. Even though unclaimed property laws are not tax laws, they are related. The unclaimed property laws look like a tax because there is an annual filing requirement governed by state law; and it feels like a tax because compliance requires ongoing monitoring of changes in laws and regulations. Because of these similarities, the tax department is often actively involved in, and ultimately responsible for, unclaimed property compliance.

Why could this responsibility fall to the tax department professional? The tax department commonly has a structured compliance calendar to ensure the timely completion of periodic tax filing deadlines, and this calendar is easily adapted to unclaimed property reporting deadlines. Also, because tax professionals are most familiar with the process of state and federal tax audits, they are often left with managing an unclaimed property audit if it occurs. Therefore, tax professionals need to be aware of state unclaimed property rules and regulations.

Auditors tell us that 80 percent of companies believe they are compliant in the world of Unclaimed Property … but they are not. Even companies that think they are “technically” in compliance may be under-reporting because, for example, they may:

  1. Be applying the wrong dormancy period
  2. Not be reporting all property types
  3. Failing to take into consideration property that may be outsourced to a third party (such as securities or payroll)
  4. Forgetting about merger and acquisition activity. Mergers and acquisitions can lead to potential exposure because of the acquired entity’s historical accounting practices and lack of compliance.

By recognizing where the risks exist, tax professionals can implement the necessary policies and procedures (or utilize existing processes) to make sure their company is compliant with all of the various states’ rules and regulations and establish the adequate cash reserves needed to protect their company from fines and fees should an audit occur.

Take Action

Contact Sovos to learn more about unclaimed property solutions. 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Karen Jackson

Karen Jackson is an account executive focused on mid-to large-scale organizations throughout the United States, including in California, DC, Georgia, New Hampshire, Tennessee, and Vermont. Her focus centers on helping companies’ unclaimed property departments get, and stay, compliant. Karen’s strengths are educating prospects on unclaimed property cloud based software and outsourcing service and to build and maintain strong relationships. Prior to joining the sales world, Karen’s background included education and law. To keep balance in her life Karen can be found dancing Argentine Tango in Iowa and everywhere she travels.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

ShipCompliant United States
June 4, 2020
Granholm: 15 Years of Shipping Wine…and More

How much can change in fifteen years?  It was May 2005 when the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in Granholm v. Heald, one of the most consequential beverage alcohol-related cases the Court has heard. The case challenged laws in Michigan and New York that permitted in-state wineries to make direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipments to their […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 4, 2020
European Court Rules Against UK on VAT Treatment of Futures Trading

In the midst of ongoing negotiations following the UK’s exit from the European Union (EU), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that the UK has impermissibly expanded the scope of its 0% VAT rate on futures trading.  And, that this has been occurring over a period spanning more than forty […]

ShipCompliant United States
June 3, 2020
4 Steps to Get Started Shipping DtC

Direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping of beverage alcohol products is a $3 billion dollar market that continues to grow annually. DtC shipping can be a great way to grow your business by reaching new audiences, expanding your customer base, and increasing your sales. But, before you can take advantage of this growing market, there are some steps […]

E-Invoicing Compliance LATAM Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 3, 2020
Latin America: An Update on E-Invoice Requirements

In the field of global e-invoicing and tax control, most eyes have been focused on trailblazing initiatives in Asia, as countries such as India, Vietnam and Thailand look set to introduce new reforms in this area. However, even in the home of mandatory digital tax controls – Latin America – where mandatory clearance of B2B […]

EMEA IPT Italy Tax Compliance
June 3, 2020
Italian Parafiscal Complexities

Premium tax and parafiscal compliance for insurers authorised to operate under the Italian regime can be challenging. For the experienced, it may seem that each year brings a different obligation to be met with new requirements often being introduced. There are almost always links between an upcoming year’s reporting requirements and declarations made in previous […]